When an object that the extension understands and can provide intellisense for is passed to another function, that function has no way of knowing what type the parameters are, and cannot provide any intellisense.
I understand this is a natural symptom of the language being dynamic, but could we annotate our functions to provide the extension with hints about the parameter types? Maybe following a syntax similar to the annotations the closure compiler can parse?
If I wanted to try modifying the extension to have this functionality - where should I start?
-Thanks
I understand this is a natural symptom of the language being dynamic, but could we annotate our functions to provide the extension with hints about the parameter types? Maybe following a syntax similar to the annotations the closure compiler can parse?
If I wanted to try modifying the extension to have this functionality - where should I start?
-Thanks
